AI, Art, Entertainment

“What fate imposes, men must needs abide; It boots not to resist both wind and tide.”
Henry VI, Part 3 (Act 4, Scene 3)

AI movie generation is blowing up right now. As a technologist, I watch this with amazement and no small admiration. But I’ve been writing recently; as an author, I watch with a growing unease. 

This Star Wars AI short by Kavan Cardoza is technically astounding and visually stunning. Made alone, by himself, with AI tools in 14 days. An amazing achievement. 

Read more here, on Forbes:

But: extrapolate a bit. When the creation of art is essentially free, will it still be art? When we have infinite Star Wars shorts, all of them visually stunning, all produced with very low investment, which ones will have meaning to us? How will we find those that do? Will art disappear, and be replaced by mere entertainment? I wonder where this is taking us…

You might argue that the people creating these videos are artists also, they just use a different tool. Michelangelo had brushes and a chisel, these artists have Veo and Midjourney and the like. And there is truth in that. A video may be visually stunning, perhaps even entertaining, but are we watching simply for the novelty, or does the AI artist have some deeper truth they are conveying? What is the difference between art and entertainment, anyway? Why is Star Wars entertainment, but Citizen Kane is art? Is that even a valid distinction? And does the effort required to produce a work, the struggle, does that mean anything? If all art is free to create, is it art? AI videos are on a path to being free – just type in a few words, and get a movie. 

I don’t have answers, I mostly have questions.

But.

Art leaves us different than it found us. When I finish Star Wars, am I different? Does it change my behavior or my thinking? I am not sure – for some, I imagine, Star Wars set them on a path they might not have been on. A path to adventure, a path to computers, to aspiration more broadly. For myself, no, it was just entertainment. That is surely a subjective test, though – what is art for you may be just noise to me. I suspect many of my friends might not even be able to finish Wind, Sand, and Stars by Saint-Exupéry, whereas that book gave me perspective on very important things, even “the meaning of life.” 

One can imagine that AI slop will overtake everything. Especially personalized slop. Imagine your search history writ large – even the searches you wished you could run, but didn’t. All the books you’ve read, the movies you’ve loved. Now, imagine your Friday night movie as distilled personalized entertainment, reading all your inner thoughts and desires, and starring yourself and your friends. Certainly possible, even probable. Would it be good for us? Who knows? I’m guessing not. 

One could also imagine a renaissance in story-telling, where AI slop goes into the waste bucket and only those with a real story to tell, something to communicate, only those stories will gain an audience. I’d like to think this is so. Somehow, I doubt it. Not least, the economic motive will come into play.

So, what’s different now? Why is AI art somehow different than the introduction of new forms of media that have come before? We used to have to go to the art – visit the museum, buy the book, attend the concert. And work to consume it, to learn from it. Now it just comes to us. And it comes to us through video – the most addictive drug humanity has yet invented. Ever watch a 2-year-old in front of a TV? It’s frightening, honestly. They are in the grip of a drug. One that can be used for good (Sesame Street), or ill (pick your poison – for me, Cocomelon…)

In this wilderness of pixel-perfect, free, automatically generated media, how will we find the good stuff? TikTok? Curators? I don’t really have answers. But when all that media becomes personalized – when you and I are *in* the media – will curation really do it? I guess not. Again, I don’t have answers, just questions. 

This isn’t just a question of movies, by the way. Amazon is becoming crowded with AI books. Spotify has recently been embroiled in a controversy surrounding AI-generated music. You may have been listening to AI music without realizing it. It surely devalues the work of human artists. At the same time, if you didn’t know you were listening to AI music, does it really matter? Questions, not answers.

Spotify is full of AI music, and some say it’s ruining the platform

Supposedly AI-generated ‘bands’ like Jet Fuel & Ginger Ales are raising eyebrows-and racking up thousands of Spotify streams.

What should be the role of AI in creating Art? And does the question really matter? Events have gravity, one of my fictional characters likes to say – things have a natural trajectory, and per Shakespeare above, some things are not easily resisted. All I can say is, be thoughtful about what you consume and be careful what you wish for.

Charles McCarry on writing

So, I’m reading up on the obligatory scenes in spy novels, in preparation for a book I am thinking of writing, and I stumble on this gem: How to Write Spy Novels, by Charles McCarry. I’ve loved his books for many years, especially The Tears of Autumn. Here’s how the article starts:

ALTHOUGH I’VE WRITTEN six novels in which some of the characters are spies, I’m not sure that I know what a “spy novel” is, or exactly how it is different from any other kind of novel. This fact became clear to me in 1973 when I turned in the manuscript of my novel “The Tears of Autumn.” My editor seemed to like it well enough, but the publisher did not. He summoned me to New York and, in his office high above lower Park Avenue, banged the manuscript on his desk.

“This book is talky, it’s slow, and nobody is going to believe a goddamn word of the plot,” he said. “Where’s the car chase? Where’s the torture scene? Where’s the sex? Where’s the good Russian? Do you call this a thriller?”

“No,” I said. He didn’t hear me.

Right off the bat: there are the obligatory scenes, and sure enough, the implied advice by a writer I admire to just skip them. Instead, this:

A novel is a collaboration between the writer and the reader, a strip of exposed film that must be developed in the consciousness of the reader. A piece of writing does not become a novel until this process takes place in the minds of many, many readers, who compare the characters and the imaginary world in which they live to their own experience of life, and in talking about the book to their friends become a part of its atmosphere.

He complains / explains that in fact, he doesn’t write spy novels, he simply writes novels in which the characters are spies. E.g.:

The elements of tradecraft that thrill us in books — cover stories, clandestine meetings, dead drops, telephone codes and so on — are techniques familiar to anyone who has ever covered a big story for a newspaper, negotiated a big contract against serious competition or conducted a clandestine love affair. Men and women who betray their spouses, a homely enough situation, often tell themselves that they are acting in a higher cause: true love. All traitors are alike.

and

Yet if the writer sets out to write what he believes, rather than what he knows, he is likely to produce propaganda…The novelist must see things as they are because his purpose is to record and illuminate human experience. The goal of politics is to alter human nature.

I find another article, Between the Real and the Believable, which contains this beauty:

Soon after this work appeared, I found myself at a dinner party in Northampton, Mass., seated next to an agitated feminist, who, like my unhappy character, was young and beautiful and a recent bride. Throughout dinner, she told me how much she hated the girl in the book, whose behavior she had found to be utterly unrealistic and an insult to women — “male chauvinist propaganda,” she called it.

I was not surprised by the onslaught. For a writer in America, going out to dinner is like living as an American in Europe: Total strangers think they can say anything they like to you. Still, I had trouble grasping the point. Why did a 1950s fictional character have to conform to an ideological model that had not yet been invented at the period in which the novel took place?

I asked my critic to tell me in plain English why she disliked and distrusted my character so. After a moment of angry silence the woman threw half a glass of California burgundy on my best gray suit and replied, “Because I used to be just like her!”

and

For a decade at the height of the Cold War, I worked abroad under cover as an intelligence agent. After I resigned, intending to spend the rest of my life writing fiction and knowing what tricks the mind can play when the gates are thrown wide open, as they are by the act of writing, between the imagination and that part of the brain in which information is stored, I took the precaution of writing a closely remembered narrative of my clandestine experiences. After correcting the manuscript, I burned it.

WOW. Can you imagine writing a book, then just casually burning it? He says he did it to get the real world out of his head, so he could proceed with inventing things; he strangely found that readers found the invented more believable than the real.

What I kept for my own use was the atmosphere of secret life: How it worked on the five senses and what it did to the heart and mind. All the rest went up in flames, setting me free henceforth to make it all up. In all important matters, such as the creation of characters and the invention of plots, with rare and minor exceptions, that is what I have done. And, as might be expected, when I have been weak enough to use something that really happened as an episode in a novel, it is that piece of scrap, buried in a landfill of the imaginary, readers invariably refuse to believe.

Just as often, however, irony prevails. A novel I wrote as a parable on hubris, entirely out of thin air, about the Kennedy assassination, has been passed from hand to hand like some sort of samizdat containing the inner mystery of the event. [Me: this is ‘The Tears of Autumn,’ one of my favorite, dare I say it, spy novels.] Not long ago, an old Washington hand, whom I had asked to read the galley proofs of my forthcoming novel about Washington and the management of a wholly fictitious constitutional crisis, phoned me in a dudgeon: “You’ve written about the way this town really is, and after looking into this mirror I’m not sure I want to go down to the office anymore.”

There you have it: write what you know, not what you believe, and don’t write a spy novel. Can’t wait to try this out.

My reading in 2024

I had a bit of a strange reading year. As I’ve mentioned elsewhere, I’ve started writing, and much of my reading was to support my writing. As a result, I read dozens of Kindle samples of interesting books, evaluating their first chapters like chess openings. And then, unless they were really interesting, dropping them. The internet has broken my attention span…

The golden age of piracy and colonial Boston

My first work of fiction was published this year, The Shanty Man. It’s set during the Golden Age of Piracy and features an intrepid young female heroine. I have thoughts of expanding it to a novel. Colonial Boston is a rich vein to mine, and I’ve been reading about the era, particularly relating to pirates and Cotton Mather, a fascinating, contradictory, conflicted figure of the era. He was perhaps best known for his role in the Salem Witch Trials, but he was very heavily involved in ministering to convicted pirates. Perhaps more on that someday in another post.

The Life and Times of Cotton Mather by Kenneth Silverman is the Pulitzer prize winning go-to biography, which I’m in the middle of. Cinnamon and Gunpowder by Eli Brown is a fun modern take on piracy.
Two good historical books on pirates: The Republic of Pirates by Colin Woodard, and Pirates of New England by Gail Selinger. I read a smattering of other books on pirates but not enough to take credit for them this year. Bone Rattler by Eliot Pattison, is one of very few works of historical fiction I found about Colonial America that were not about the Salem witch trials, at least that looked interesting. I chipped away at Two Years Before the Mast by Richard Henry Dana, which I have been reading portions of on and off for a few years, not least because it contains interesting mentions of early Kanaka (native Hawaiian) sailors, a topic of interest to me as I live in Hawaii. Velvet Undercover by Teri Brown is a so-so spy novel with a 17-year-old heroine, the same age as the hero of my story The Shanty Man, which I read to see how other authors treat that age.

The medieval era

I’m putting the finishing touches on my novel of Richard the Lionheart, and so have been reading a good deal of medieval history over the last few years. These books are at the tail end of my deep dive into the medieval era. The Time Traveler’s Guide to Medieval England by Ian Mortimer is an invaluable dive into what real life was like for normal people in the medieval era. Alle Thyng Hath Tyme by Gillian Adler is an interesting exploration of time as perceived by those same people.

I’ve been reading Special Operations in the Age of Chivalry, 1100-1550 by Dr. Yuval Noah Harari. That’s right, the author of the super-famous Sapiens was actually a medievalist before becoming a best-selling author of broad-based works on human history. His chapter on Conrad of Tyre’s assassination is highly informative, even though I’ve read a great deal about the incident before now. More here.

Also, did you know that T. E. Lawrence, better known as Lawrence of Arabia, wrote his Ph.D. thesis on crusader castles? Crusader Castles. Really fun book. More here on my Richard the Lionheart substack

Robin Hood by Sean McGlynn is a romp through the history of, well, Robin Hood. Lastly, there’s thread of Macbeth running through my Richard novel, and I read it again this year.

Travel: Japan and Iceland

This year, my wife and I went to Japan for a short trip to celebrate our 40th anniversary. I read some interesting Japan-related material as a result. The Sailor Who Fell from Grace with the Sea, by Yukio Mishima, was a surprisingly lyrical short novel, considering the author. I read Shogun, by James Clavell, for like the 20th time (and I loved the TV series as well!). A Quiet Place by Seicho Matsumoto was a quiet mystery, and I read two very not quiet books, Three Assassins and The Mantis, by Kotaro Isaka (of Bullet Train fame).

We also did a short trip to Iceland to see the northern lights, with some success. Along the way, I read Eyrbyggja Saga and the quirky Museum of Hidden Beings by Arngrimur Sigurdsson.

Historical fiction

Ironfire

I read a smattering of historical fiction this year. I re-read Ironfire by David Ball, a novel set during the 16th-century battle between Christians and Muslims over the island of Malta, and Prince of Foxes by Samuel Shellabarger, a novel set in Borgia Italy. The Bones of Paris by Laurie R. King is a jazz-age Paris mystery novel and good fun. The Penelopiad, Margaret Atwood, is the story of Odysseus’s return home from Penelope’s perspective.

Book club, literary stuff

I only intermittently attended my book club this year, but some good reads came out of it. Every Drop Is a Man’s Nightmare is a collection of short stories by Megan Kamalei Kakimoto, who is from Kaneohe, the town next to where I live in Hawaii. Sea People by Christina Thompson is a new history of Polynesian migration, exploring how Hawaii and the greater Pacific region came to be settled. Raven Leilani’s Luster was almost a pick for the book club this year, but I read it anyway. It’s funny, it’s sexy, it’s about a young woman invited into an open marriage, it’s about…well, you can look it up. At the other end of the spectrum, if you want a sometimes-disturbing glimpse into the mind of an older man, read the brilliant Jim Harrison’s The Great Leader.

Comfort food

I call the mystery, thriller, and spy novel genre “comfort food,” though it’s often not comfortable. But it’s usually straightforward entertainment. I particularly liked The Secret Hours by Mick Herron, about which I will say nothing because almost anything is a spoiler. If you like the TV series Slow Horses, read this book. Damascus Station by David McCloskey is particularly topical given the fall of Syria & Assad. A Shadow Intelligence by Oliver Harris was surprisingly good. The Charlemagne Pursuit by Steve Berry is exactly what you expect from a Steve Berry novel. Big Bear, Little Bear by David Brierley is a very good Le Carré cold war spy novel. Prince of Fire is a canonical Daniel Silva thriller with a lot of pointed commentary, implicit and explicit, about the Arab/Israeli conflict. I even read a spy romance: It Had to Be You by Eliza Jane Brazier.

Fantasy & Sci-Fi

I read less of this than I usually do. One of my favorite books of the year was Ink Blood Sister Scribe by Emma Törzs – it sucked me in from the first paragraphs and did not let go. The Justice of Kings by Richard Swan is an epic fantasy with judges and lawyers – seriously. Much better than it sounds. There is violence and magic 🙂

Foundry by Eliot Peper was a really fun and short novel that has chip manufacturing and our rather alarming dependence on Taiwan at its foundation. I paired it with a re-read of Count Zero by William Gibson, which I seem to re-read almost yearly. Mickey7 by Edward Ashton was fun and in the zone of Artemis or The Martian by Andy Weir.

Well, there you have it. I read a lot, but honestly, there were few super-standouts this year. I guess my standouts are Ink Blood Sister Scribe, My Effin’ Life, The Sailor Who Fell From Grace With the Sea, The Secret Hours, and The Great Leader.

Oh: Rush is probably my favorite band, and I read last year’s Christmas present, Geddy Lee’s biography My Effin’ Life. If you have the faintest interest in Rush, get it.

41 books by my count, vs. 47 last year…

Víkingur Ólafsson @ Harpa in Iceland

For my 61st birthday – how strange it is, to write those words – my wife took me to Iceland. There is a longer account of my trip coming, with travel advice as well as “what we did”. Our main objective was to see the northern lights, and we succeeded spectacularly. A story for another post.

By happy accident, we had to move our trip up a week from my birthday, and I discovered that a pianist I love, Víkingur Ólafsson, would be playing at Harpa during our visit. And he would be playing the Goldberg Variations, one of the summits of the piano repertoire. 

Now, Harpa is a magnificent building, and in my previous two trips to Iceland, I had somehow managed not to visit it. And Víkingur Ólafsson is a world-class pianist, the Deutsche Gramaphone Artist of the Year for 2019, and he happens to be Icelandic. And I would later learn that the date of the concert, February 14th, happened to be his 40th birthday. All in all the omens were favorable. I scrambled to get tickets – the event was nearly sold out – but I succeeded in getting nosebleed seats (the second to last row of the enormous main hall). 

Harpa is a magnificent building. The lobby interior is vast and surrounded by crystalline glass structures lit with a slowly rotating color, blue being the most predominant. There is a restaurant downstairs, which we did not try (favoring Fjallkonen for dinner), and as well there is a jazz club on the top floor, which, sadly, we did not have the chance to visit. One can take the elevator or climb the stairs as we did, making our way nearly to the top, slowly, taking too many pictures as we went. 

As we wait, I listen to the crowd. They are mostly Icelandic, judging from the conversation and the clothing. But here and there, I hear a smattering of English and German, and some guests appeared to be from Asia. (I saw many more Asian tourists than I expected, in both our hotel and out and about). Finally, the doors open, and I hustle to my seat to get some shots of the concert hall before people crowd the hall.

It is a bit like being in the Imperial Senate in Star Wars. The room is dramatic, and very steep. A mild vertigo starts for me. I never had issues with vertigo until I went to the Guggenheim in New York City. Now I feel a faint discomfort when in steep, open balcony seating. But I master that and head up to the edge to take some photos. 

The room is oddly smoky, as if a rock concert is about to break out. There are neon red striped lights surrounding the stage, and a jagged orange strip light running through the floor of the stage, surely intended to evoke a lava flow. The lights changed periodically during the show, very unusual for classical performances. 

Soon it’s time, and a tall, trim, bespectacled man takes the stage. He is dapper, wearing a modern-cut, medium-blue suit. He looks like an earnest graduate student, not one of the most brilliant pianists in the world.

The Theme and Variations is one of the canonical forms of classical music. A theme is played, then developed in repeated in variations, usually alternating between fast and slow, happy and sad. The Goldberg Variations are one of the most difficult and beautiful pieces of the piano repertoire, consisting of a theme and 30 variations. Perhaps the best-known recordings are by Glenn Gould, who famously recorded the piece twice, once as a young man and once not that long before he died. 

The theme opens with a crystalline singing, with simple lines and chords. Writing descriptively about a musical performance is always difficult, but let me start by simply saying that Ólafsson’s performance was astounding. His rendering of the Goldberg was over 75 minutes in duration. He of course played this without any breaks and without any score to guide him, it was all from memory. I do not believe that during that entire performance, I heard anything like a mistake. His tone was absolutely beautiful, and even during the most frenetic parts of the piece, his sound had total clarity. Every note was audible, even when buried inside a chord. Every phrase had total conviction and a deeply felt intent. Glenn Gould was famous for bringing out the “inside lines”, the melodies lurking in the lower registers and not the highest pitch. Ólafsson has a similar ability. Even my wife, who knows classical music but doesn’t listen to it much, remarked on that aspect of his playing. 

I recently had a chance to hear Helene Grimaud in Boston. She is also a world-famous pianist and justifiably so. But I must say that Olaffson’s playing affected me more deeply and had much greater tonal clarity and precision. And I enjoyed her concert very much – I am not attempting to denigrate her playing at all, simply to give some perspective on how elevated this particular performance felt to me. Even at his fastest playing, it seemed clear that Ólafsson had another gear we did not hear.

I saw John Williams, the guitarist, some time ago in Boston. My friend Lynn remarked that during a particularly difficult passage, Williams seemed to have grown an extra finger. During one of the most frenetic variations, I thought Ólafsson had grown an extra hand. It just did not seem possible, what I was hearing.

Visually, he was intriguing to watch. He did not have as many quirky mannerisms as some pianists do, but he did perform the occasional self-conducting (ala Glenn Gould) when he was playing a single, slow-paced melody. Occasionally, during meditative sections, his head would sink, nearly touching the keyboard. Ólafsson’s technique was impeccable and visually interesting. Of particular note was his constant hand-crossing, playing blistering scales at a frenetic pace, where his left hand played rising scales while the right hand crossed over to play a melody below, both in pitch and on the keyboard.

The auditorium acoustics were wonderful. We heard complete clarity, even in the next-to-last row. With the lights down, it was almost like a meditation session, as the music surrounded us for almost 80 minutes in a long continuous stream. I confess, I almost nodded off once, but in a good way :()

Variation 29’s frenetic pace and associated technique faded to Variation 30’s stately, quiet chorale-like structure, then to the reprise of the quiet, calm opening theme. The room was silent for a good 20-30 seconds – whether in appreciation, in unsureness of whether he was done, or just a desire not to break the spell, I cannot say. The last reason for me.

Then cheers and bravos broke out. The hometown crowd brought him back for bows four times. After the last, he spoke for a few moments in Icelandic. There was frequent laughter from the crowd. Very much a hometown crowd. Then he left, and the lights came up. The show was over. The usual bring-back-the-artist-to-play encores was not to be.

I asked my concert neighbors to my left, clearly Icelandic, what he had said. For a change, one of the two, the man, seemed uncomfortable answering in English (most Icelanders I have attempted conversation with have impeccable English). The woman said, “He said something like, after this, there can be no encore.” Her translation was imprecise, but I certainly took her to mean not that he was tired, but rather that he held the piece in such high regard he did not wish to break the spell of it. We had no complaints.

If you are interested in any of this, you can listen to Ólafsson’s recording of the Goldberg Variations on Spotify. 

J.S. Bach: Goldberg Variations

Listen to J.S. Bach: Goldberg Variations on Spotify. Johann Sebastian Bach · Album · 2023 · 32 songs.

He has also written in-depth thoughts on the piece, which you can read here: https://www.theguardian.com/music/2023/oct/06/vikingur-olafsson-pianist-on-bach-goldberg-variations

In case my review sounds over-enthusiastic, here are two others, including his recent Carnegie Hall performance.

Víkingur Ólafsson sets new gold standard in Bach’s Variations

United Kingdom Bach: Víkingur Ólafsson (piano). Royal Festival Hall, London, 22.9.2023. (CSa) JS Bach – Goldberg Variations, BWV.988 It is said that Bach’s insomniac patron, Count Keyserling, in need of musical entertainment to help him pass his sleepless nights, commissioned some clavier pieces from the composer to be played by the court’s resident harpsichordist Johann Gottlieb Goldberg.

Review: Vikingur Olafsson’s ‘Goldbergs’ Mesmerize Carnegie Hall

In his debut on the main Carnegie stage, Olafsson gave a spectacular reading of Bach’s “Goldberg” Variations.

Lastly, there is an excellent interview between Ólafsson and the Glenn Gould Foundation to be found here.

A happy accident indeed!

Books, Startups, Travel, Search, Music