“What fate imposes, men must needs abide; It boots not to resist both wind and tide.”
— Henry VI, Part 3 (Act 4, Scene 3)
AI movie generation is blowing up right now. As a technologist, I watch this with amazement and no small admiration. But I’ve been writing recently; as an author, I watch with a growing unease.
This Star Wars AI short by Kavan Cardoza is technically astounding and visually stunning. Made alone, by himself, with AI tools in 14 days. An amazing achievement.
Read more here, on Forbes:
But: extrapolate a bit. When the creation of art is essentially free, will it still be art? When we have infinite Star Wars shorts, all of them visually stunning, all produced with very low investment, which ones will have meaning to us? How will we find those that do? Will art disappear, and be replaced by mere entertainment? I wonder where this is taking us…
You might argue that the people creating these videos are artists also, they just use a different tool. Michelangelo had brushes and a chisel, these artists have Veo and Midjourney and the like. And there is truth in that. A video may be visually stunning, perhaps even entertaining, but are we watching simply for the novelty, or does the AI artist have some deeper truth they are conveying? What is the difference between art and entertainment, anyway? Why is Star Wars entertainment, but Citizen Kane is art? Is that even a valid distinction? And does the effort required to produce a work, the struggle, does that mean anything? If all art is free to create, is it art? AI videos are on a path to being free – just type in a few words, and get a movie.
I don’t have answers, I mostly have questions.
But.
Art leaves us different than it found us. When I finish Star Wars, am I different? Does it change my behavior or my thinking? I am not sure – for some, I imagine, Star Wars set them on a path they might not have been on. A path to adventure, a path to computers, to aspiration more broadly. For myself, no, it was just entertainment. That is surely a subjective test, though – what is art for you may be just noise to me. I suspect many of my friends might not even be able to finish Wind, Sand, and Stars by Saint-Exupéry, whereas that book gave me perspective on very important things, even “the meaning of life.”
One can imagine that AI slop will overtake everything. Especially personalized slop. Imagine your search history writ large – even the searches you wished you could run, but didn’t. All the books you’ve read, the movies you’ve loved. Now, imagine your Friday night movie as distilled personalized entertainment, reading all your inner thoughts and desires, and starring yourself and your friends. Certainly possible, even probable. Would it be good for us? Who knows? I’m guessing not.
One could also imagine a renaissance in story-telling, where AI slop goes into the waste bucket and only those with a real story to tell, something to communicate, only those stories will gain an audience. I’d like to think this is so. Somehow, I doubt it. Not least, the economic motive will come into play.
So, what’s different now? Why is AI art somehow different than the introduction of new forms of media that have come before? We used to have to go to the art – visit the museum, buy the book, attend the concert. And work to consume it, to learn from it. Now it just comes to us. And it comes to us through video – the most addictive drug humanity has yet invented. Ever watch a 2-year-old in front of a TV? It’s frightening, honestly. They are in the grip of a drug. One that can be used for good (Sesame Street), or ill (pick your poison – for me, Cocomelon…)
In this wilderness of pixel-perfect, free, automatically generated media, how will we find the good stuff? TikTok? Curators? I don’t really have answers. But when all that media becomes personalized – when you and I are *in* the media – will curation really do it? I guess not. Again, I don’t have answers, just questions.
This isn’t just a question of movies, by the way. Amazon is becoming crowded with AI books. Spotify has recently been embroiled in a controversy surrounding AI-generated music. You may have been listening to AI music without realizing it. It surely devalues the work of human artists. At the same time, if you didn’t know you were listening to AI music, does it really matter? Questions, not answers.
What should be the role of AI in creating Art? And does the question really matter? Events have gravity, one of my fictional characters likes to say – things have a natural trajectory, and per Shakespeare above, some things are not easily resisted. All I can say is, be thoughtful about what you consume and be careful what you wish for.